While it is true US stocks turned in a negative performance for the past 10 years, a balanced portfolio would have shown better results and few investors that paid attention to their asset allocation would in fact hold 100% s+p 500
here is a relatively straightforward global portfolio
us total stock market russell 3000 30%
us small value russell 2000 value 10%
emerging markets msci 10%
developed intl msci 10%
aggregate bonds 40%
$ 1000 invested in this portfolio for the last ten years would have grown to $1630 vs $880 for 100% s+p 500
the 20 year numbers are close;
4920 for the 60/40 and 4,500 for the 100% sp 500
missing out on emerging markets would have cut performance drastically
$1000 in emerging markets grew to $3,000 in the last 10 years $17,280 in the last 20 years
No comments:
Post a Comment