S+P 500 5 Day Chart
A resource for debunking the investments myths peddled by the financial press and Wall Street hype and presenting rational,sensible investing approaches based on sound research and academic findings. This blog is maintained by Lawrence Weinman MBA an independent Registered Investment Advisor www.lweinmanadvisor1.com
Tuesday, April 21, 2015
Saturday, April 18, 2015
If You Think These Two News Items are Unrelated....You Probably Haven't Worked in The Financial markets
NYT:
Bloomberg Terminals Suffer Widespread Failures
The bigger fear on European trading desks was that regulators may determine that Bloomberg’s dominance is actually a systemic risk, in need of some regulatory fix, on top of other recent technology additions.
“We recognize that Bloomberg is a monopoly, and we probably lean on them too hard, but it’s a hard nut to crack,” the head of a credit trading desk at a large bank said on Friday, speaking on the condition of anonymity.....
One sales trader, based in Geneva, said his company had a few dozen Bloomberg terminals and used them mainly for buying and sellingexchange-traded funds and credit and for research. None of the firm’s terminals were able to connect for about 2 hours 20 minutes but worked later in the day, he said.
When asked what problems the failure created, the trader said: “Problems? Simple: No prices. Nothing. So you can’t do anything at all.”
He said that simply switching to a Thomson Reuters terminal was not an option for some. “People are used to going through ’Berg and so it’s confusing for a lot of us who never use Reuters,” he said.
It was hard to immediately determine the failure’s effect on specific financial markets. Some traders said that the failure encouraged the negative sentiment that pushed stock prices around the world lower.
FT
Friday, April 17, 2015
The Best, Most Honest Explanation I Have Ever Seen in the WSJ (or anywhere else in the financial media) About Short Term Market Movements
WSJ money beat today
"Every once in a while, equity markets lurch, leaving investors stumped. Where’s the kerbstone that tripped them up?
Sometimes there isn’t one. The market just trod on its own shoelaces. That could well be what happened in Europe on Friday morning as Europe’s leading indices dropped between 1% and 2% amid a dearth of the sort of news that generally triggers big market moves. And Germany’s 10-year bond yields lurched ever closer to negative territory. U.S. stock futures were down 0.67% at 7.35 a.m. EDT."
On the other hand you can find this at cnbc "explaining" today's move
On the other hand you can find this at cnbc "explaining" today's move
Tuesday, April 14, 2015
All Emerging Markets are Not the Same
I have questioned several times in posts on emerging markets that the "asset class" is not a very useful one as it includes markets with extremely divergent characteristics.
The most important distinction in the emerging markets groups is between Latin American and Asia. Asian economies have strong current accounts positions many of them in surpluses, benefit from lower commodity prices, and have displayed strong economic growth. While the Latin American countries the largest of which are Brazil and Mexico are dependent on commodity exports and have weaker national accounts.
The recent run up in shares in China and Hong Kong has further increased the performance differential between Emerging Asia, total Emerging Market Indices and Latin America.. Over the last 3 years Emerging Asia (ticker GMF) has produced a total return of 36.9%, total emerging markets 11.3% and Latin America (ticker ILF) -28%
Graph below shows growth of $100,000
What about the long term future ? A recent bloomberg article reports on longer term projections for global economic growth. The forecasts see a growing share of global GDP for Asia most notably China and India. Other Asian economies are expected to grow strongly while growth in Latin America will remain slow.
The most important distinction in the emerging markets groups is between Latin American and Asia. Asian economies have strong current accounts positions many of them in surpluses, benefit from lower commodity prices, and have displayed strong economic growth. While the Latin American countries the largest of which are Brazil and Mexico are dependent on commodity exports and have weaker national accounts.
The recent run up in shares in China and Hong Kong has further increased the performance differential between Emerging Asia, total Emerging Market Indices and Latin America.. Over the last 3 years Emerging Asia (ticker GMF) has produced a total return of 36.9%, total emerging markets 11.3% and Latin America (ticker ILF) -28%
Graph below shows growth of $100,000
![]() |
| 3 Year Returns Growth of $100,000 Emerging Asia (gold) Overall Emerging Markets (blue) and Latin America (green) |
What about the long term future ? A recent bloomberg article reports on longer term projections for global economic growth. The forecasts see a growing share of global GDP for Asia most notably China and India. Other Asian economies are expected to grow strongly while growth in Latin America will remain slow.
Get ready for a new economic order. In the world 15 years from now, the U.S. will be far less dominant, several emerging markets will catapult into prominence, and some of the largest European economies will be slipping behind.
That's according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's latest macroeconomic projections that go out to 2030, displayed in the chart below. The U.S. will just barely remain the global leader, with $24.8 trillion in annual output. The gray bar represents the $16.8 trillion gross domestic product projected for 2015, and the green bar shows how much bigger the economy is expected to be 15 years from now. The country, worth 25 percent of the world economy in 2006 and 23 percent in 2015, will see its share decline to 20 percent.
China's GDP will grow to more than twice its size today, helping the Asian powerhouse to almost entirely close its gap with the U.S.
India, ranked eighth for 2015, will climb past Brazil, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Japan to take third place in the world ranking. The International Monetary Fund calls India "the bright spot in the global landscape." The country will have the largest workforce in the world within the next 15 years, the IMF notes, and among the youngest.
Tuesday, April 7, 2015
Monday, April 6, 2015
Performance Chasers`: Individual Investors...and Many of Their Advisors Too
Etf,com has reported in flows in and out of ETFs http://www.etf.com/sections/fund-flows/currency-hedged-etfs-drive-big-q1-flows?nopaging=1
The flows into ETFs over good evidence that investors are performance chasers and because of this they seldom get the returns of the asset classes they invest in...because they buy high and sell low.
This is likely the case with the currency hedged European stock ETFs.. HEDJ the fund that was top on the inflow chart below more than doubled its assets under management during the quarter. HEDJ has gained 23.6% over the past 12 months and 20.1% year to date. This means less than half the investors in HEDJ have captured all of these returns. Whatever the future outlook for HEDJ these investors have missed a good part if not most of the returns for at least the rest of the year.
And when the trend reverses,if past behavior is indicative of behavior investor in the past, they will sell out at best with only a portion of the long term returns,if not sell at a loss.
| Top Gainers Q1 2015 | |||||
| Ticker | Fund | Issuer | Flows ($M) | AUM ($M) | Turnover |
| HEDJ | WisdomTree Europe Hedged Equity | WisdomTree | 10,141.71 | 17,313.78 | 22,382.36 |
| DBEF | Deutsche X-trackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | Deutsche Bank | 5,109.65 | 7,235.47 | 8,018.95 |
| VTI | Vanguard Total Stock Market | Vanguard | 3,180.65 | 54,752.31 | 20,703.77 |
| VOO | Vanguard S&P 500 | Vanguard | 2,971.29 | 30,637.03 | 22,959.84 |
| LQD | iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond | BlackRock | 2,728.93 | 22,417.51 | 19,319.74 |
| DXJ | WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity | WisdomTree | 2,482.31 | 15,782.49 | 18,712.83 |
| HYG | iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond | BlackRock | 2,149.82 | 16,711.84 | 39,471.40 |
| IEFA | iShares Core MSCI EAFE | BlackRock | 2,034.02 | 5,418.03 | 4,306.25 |
| HEFA | iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE | BlackRock | 1,991.48 | 2,123.69 | 2,362.75 |
| USO | United States Oil | US Commodity Funds | 1,763.62 | 2,792.28 | 39,175.59 |
The market chasing of investors can be seen in the flows into international equities overall. Particularly disconcerting to individual investors is the indication that not only do individual investors follow the unwise strategy of performance chasing...if they pay an investment advisor he seems likely to be doing exactly the same thing, Quite ironic since the benefit of using an advisor should be to prevent the behavior so prevalent among individual investors...buying high and selling low.:
Allocation Shift?
International equities gathered about $42.5 billion in the first quarter, nearly half of it in currency-hedged strategies.
At the same time, U.S. equities recorded net outflows of more than $11 billion. The least-popular fund was the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY | A-98), which bled almost $31 billion in assets. While SPY is a trading vehicle, and its flows are often quite exaggerated relative to the rest of the market, it nonetheless is something of a weather vane when it comes to reading investor sentiment.
Indeed, many financial advisors are moving to reallocate away from U.S. stocks following more than a decade of U.S. outperformance relative to a variety of foreign markets, not least Europe's.
| Biggest Losers Q1 2015 | |||||
| Ticker | Fund | Issuer | Flows | AUM ($M) | Turnover |
| SPY | SPDR S&P 500 | SSgA | -30,958.95 | 185,413.71 | 1,700,430.71 |
| EEM | iShares MSCI Emerging Markets | BlackRock | -3,166.14 | 29,574.92 | 135,500.34 |
| XLF | Financial Select SPDR | SSgA | -2,653.39 | 18,043.45 | 53,904.75 |
| QQQ | PowerShares QQQ | Invesco PowerShares | -2,651.48 | 38,600.08 | 210,737.84 |
| IVV | iShares Core S&P 500 | BlackRock | -2,362.60 | 68,742.61 | 60,847.35 |
| XLP | Consumer Staples Select SPDR | SSgA | -1,754.24 | 8,261.78 | 26,904.59 |
| IYW | iShares U.S. Technology | BlackRock | -1,688.95 | 3,000.43 | 4,544.27 |
| XLI | Industrial Select SPDR | SSgA | -1,389.78 | 7,763.81 | 35,897.54 |
| ACWI | iShares MSCI ACWI | BlackRock | -1,258.27 | 6,311.55 | 7,079.25 |
| IYF | iShares U.S. Financials | BlackRock | -1,231.98 | 1,255.04 | 3,398.67 |
Saturday, April 4, 2015
Financial Markets First Quarter 2015 Review
US equity generated minimal returns for the first quarter. Non US markets however showed the highest
performance of recent years benefitting from the impact of a stronger US
dollar. In the US bond markets, the absence of any change in interest rate
policy meant continued strong performance of longer term bonds while investment
grade and high yield corporate bonds outperformed treasuries
US Equity Markets
After several years of extremely strong performance despite
high valuations, US stocks took a breather during the first quarter of 2015.
Although interest rates did not rise considerably sectors most sensitive to
interest rates had declines. Most notable were utilities which attracted
investors as “bond equivalents” and reached their highest valuations in
history. Those yield seeking investors found that stocks are not bonds and saw
a decline of 4.5% in the quarter.
After a period of underperformance, small cap stocks
outperformed large caps. This is attributable to the high dependence of large
cap multinational corporations on sales abroad which have declined in dollar
terms as the dollar has strengthened. Small cap companies tend to be domestically
oriented, hence the better performance. Those multinationals have just begun to
report quarterly earnings affected by the recent sharp fall in the Euro meaning
the factors affecting the small cap/large cap performance differential has a
high likelihood of continuing.
Selected US Stock ETFs (Total Return)
symbol
|
category
|
1Q 2015
|
1 year
|
3 year
|
spy
|
S+P 500
|
0.9%
|
12.5%
|
55.9%
|
VTI
|
Total US Stock Market
|
1.7%
|
12.1%
|
57.6%
|
PRF
|
US Large Cap Value
|
0.3%
|
9.8%
|
59.6%
|
VBR
|
US Small Cap Value
|
3.9%
|
10.7%
|
65.5%
|
Non US Markets
The patient investors who maintained their asset allocation
to non US stocks have begun to be rewarded as the lower valuation non US stocks
have begun to outperform.
Developed market stocks showed the best performance.
European corporations have seen the benefits of a lower Euro which makes
exports more competitive. Signs of economic recovery, aided by exports and
lower interest rates have pointed towards a bottoming of the recessionary
conditions in most of Europe
Despite the ongoing
crisis in Greece there has been little or no spillover to the other “PIIGS”
(Portugal, Italy, Ireland (Greece) and Spain)...another broad generalization
that was more fashion than substance. Although a grexit …Greek exit from the
Euro remains a possibility few see it as a likely scenario for the others in
the group.
The most dramatic development in the developed markets has
certainly been the Euro which fell over 10% during the first quarter. The
fundamental economic factor behind this move is the aggressive monetary easing
by the European Central Bank while the US has ended its easing policy and
will—sometime—begin raising rates. The interest rate differential in favor of
the US dollar is likely to continue and serve as a factor favoring the dollar
vs the Euro.
Additionally longer
term flows such as changed in the composition of foreign currency reserves by
Central Banks, hedging activity by US multinational corporations, and equity
investor flows all work in favor of the dollar vs the Euro although short term
reversals of the long term trend are certainly to be anticipated.
European equities had a strong performance in Euro terms.
But the combination of stronger European equity markets and a weaker dollar
provided extremely favorable environment for those who combined European stock
positions with a hedge against a weaker dollar . The hedged European stock returned 18.3% for the quarter vs. 5.5%
for the unhedged
Emerging Markets
Emerging markets also benefited from investors seeking
stocks at lower valuations than US stocks. Stronger economic performance and simulative
monetary politics in China helped as well. Even at “slower “rate of economic
growth of 7% it still represents a large differential to the US, Europe and
Japan. Emerging markets tend to attract a large amount of performance chasing
investors so with the markets in an early stage of recovery flows could
continue into these stocks.
I have written before that the categories “emerging markets”
and BRICS (Brazil Russia India China) are not very useful investing
categories. Latin Americas largest market:
Brazil along with Russia, Mexico and Venezuela are extremely dependent on oil
export and are thus hard hit by the oil price drops. The stronger dollar/weaker
local currency combination hurts these countries because so much of the
government and private sector debt is denominated in dollars.
Thus it is not surprising to see the gaps in equity
performance with overall emerging markets up .7% over the past year, overall
emerging markets +.7% and Latin America unchanged.
Selected International Stock ETFs
symbol
|
category
|
1Q 2015
|
1 year
|
3 year
|
ACWI
|
Total World Ex US
|
2.8%
|
5.6%
|
53.7%
|
EFA
|
Total Developed Markets
|
5.9%
|
-1.2%
|
28.8%
|
FEZ
|
Europe Unhedged
|
5.5%
|
-6.1%
|
33.2%
|
HEDJ
|
Europe Hedged
|
18.3%
|
23.6%
|
63.2%
|
IEMG
|
Total Emerging Markets
|
3.7%
|
0.7%
|
4.6%
|
GMF
|
Emerging Asia
|
5.5%
|
15.9%
|
25.7%
|
US Credit Markets
Although the Federal Reserve has ended its quantitative
easing policy and has indicated next move in interest rates will be higher the
timing of that rate rise and its part remains uncertain. Longer term treasury
bonds remain volatile but have still outperformed short term bonds. Long term
Investors might not see ten year treasury bonds at yield of 2% or below as very
attractive but plenty of short term players are willing to reap profits from
short term declines in interest rates of by leveraging their positions by borrowing
short term and buying long term bonds.
The selloff in high yield bonds ended during the quarter as
oil prices, although lower, stabilized. Investors benefitted and captured the
yield differential. Investment grade bond investors also benefited from the
yield differential between such bonds and treasuries.
symbol
|
category
|
1Q 2015
|
1 year
|
3 year
|
AGG
|
Total US Bond Market
|
1.2%
|
5.7%
|
9.3%
|
VCSH
|
Short Term Corporate Bonds
|
1.1%
|
0.9%
|
6.5%
|
VCGH
|
Short Term US Govt Bonds
|
0.4%
|
2.3%
|
26.8%
|
HYLD
|
Short Term High Yield Bonds
|
2.0%
|
-14.4%
|
7.9%
|
TLT
|
Long Term US Government Bonds
|
3.1%
|
23.2%
|
1.7%
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



